Corporate Governance Update: The Chairman and the CEO, a Story
|July 3rd, 2010||
|Contributed by: Michael R. Levin, The Activist Investor|
|If you studied your proxy materials carefully this year, you noticed several new disclosures, including one explaining why a company combines the CEO and Board Chair in one job, or not. Companies have indeed risen to the occasion to defend one or the other. The new disclosure, and the defense, misses the point, though: CEOs don’t even belong on the Board of Directors.|
Late last year the SEC began requiring this new disclosure, heavily abbreviated here:
Briefly describe the leadership structure of the registrant’s board, such as whether the same person serves as both principal executive officer and chairman of the board, or whether two individuals serve in those positions... If one person serves as both principal executive officer and chairman of the board … disclose whether the registrant has a lead independent director and [the] specific role [of] the lead independent director... [I]ndicate why the registrant has determined that its leadership structure is appropriate…
Incidentally, for a brief time Sen. Schumer’s proposed Shareholder Bill of Rights legislation would have required a separate CEO and Board chair. It appears that this legislation has yielded to the financial services reform bill from Sen. Dodd, which has a range of other governance reforms.
Not surprisingly, only some companies have split these roles. According to research from The Corporate Library, 38% of the companies in the S&P 500 have done so, and 44% of the Russell 1000. Interestingly, 52% of the Russell 3000 have split the roles, so small cap companies embrace this more than large cap. In any event, it might make news when it does happen, and generate an interesting and persuasive explanation.
So, proxy materials now have so much verbiage about why one or another structure makes sense for that company. At General Electric, Jeff Immelt does both CEO and Board Chair, with a lead independent director:
On the other hand, at Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffet does both jobs, well, just because:
It is Mr. Buffett’s opinion that a controlling shareholder who is active in the business, as is currently the case and has been the case for Mr. Buffett for over the last 40 years, should hold both roles. This opinion is shared by Berkshire’s full Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has not named a lead independent director.
What about some recent activist targets? Denny's just won a notable proxy battle. They separated the jobs eight years ago, as “it allows the Board to effectively develop and oversee its business strategy and monitor risk. The separate positions also allow the Board to freely perform its management oversight function.” Doesn’t seem to have done them much good.
For Detailed Investor Profiles on these Investors, click below: